Identification and Analysis of Key Drivers for Sustainable Urban Tourism Development: A case study of Shandiz

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

Abstract

A B S T R A C T
The rapid growth of Shandiz, as one of the most important tourist destinations in Razavi Khorasan Province, has created economic opportunities while simultaneously exerting pressures on natural resources, infrastructure, and the social fabric. This study aims to identify and prioritize the key drivers influencing the sustainable development of urban tourism in Shandiz and to develop foresight-based scenarios to guide strategic policymaking and planning. The research employs an applied–analytical approach with a futures studies perspective. Data were initially collected through a systematic review of theoretical literature and similar studies, and subsequently validated via semi-structured interviews with 15 experts in sustainable tourism, urban planning, environmental management, private tourism sector, and local–cultural institutions. Experts were selected based on their experience, expertise, and influential roles in the relevant domains. To analyze relationships and determine the relative importance of factors, cross-impact analysis was conducted using MicMac software, identifying the key drivers with the greatest impact and uncertainty. Then, by employing Scenario Wizard software, various combinations of these drivers were used to generate and evaluate three main scenarios. The results indicated that four drivers—“diversification of tourism products,” “institutional coordination,” “digital governance infrastructure,” and “empowerment of non-governmental actors”—play the most strategic role in the future of tourism in Shandiz. Scenario comparison revealed that the third scenario, with the highest synergy and alignment, outlines a sustainable, participatory, and technology-driven development path. By leveraging local capacities and digital innovation, this scenario facilitates the realization of competitive and smart tourism, serving as a basis for strategic planning and policymaking in Shandiz.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Tourism has emerged as one of the fastest-growing global industries, generating substantial economic opportunities while simultaneously exerting pressure on natural, cultural, and social systems. The case of Shandiz, a prominent tourist destination located near Mashhad in Razavi Khorasan Province, illustrates these dynamics. Traditionally valued as a summer retreat and cultural landscape, Shandiz has increasingly developed into a national and regional tourism hub. Its rapid growth, however, has created significant challenges, including strain on infrastructure, pressure on natural resources, and transformations in the social fabric of local communities. Such dynamics underscore the need for sustainable urban tourism, which reconciles economic benefits with environmental stewardship and cultural integrity. Despite its potential, tourism development in Shandiz has often been uncoordinated, underpinned by weak institutional alignment, limited community empowerment, and insufficient adoption of digital technologies. This study responds to these challenges by adopting a futures studies perspective to identify the most influential drivers shaping the sustainable development of urban tourism in Shandiz. It also explores how different combinations of these drivers could generate alternative scenarios for the city’s tourism future. The overarching aim is to provide policymakers and stakeholders with a forward-looking framework that supports strategic planning and ensures the resilience and competitiveness of Shandiz as a tourism destination.
 
Methodology
The research is applied–analytical in nature and structured around futures studies methodologies. Data collection proceeded in two phases. The first phase involved a systematic review of theoretical literature and comparable case studies, resulting in a preliminary set of thirty drivers influencing tourism sustainability. The second phase validated and refined these drivers through semi-structured interviews with 15 experts representing diverse fields such as sustainable tourism, urban planning, environmental management, the private tourism sector, and local–cultural institutions. Experts were selected based on their experience, professional expertise, and their roles in shaping tourism-related decisions. For data analysis, a cross-impact matrix was constructed and analyzed using MicMac software, which revealed the relational dynamics among drivers and identified those with the greatest influence and uncertainty. Following this, Scenario Wizard software was employed to simulate different combinations of driver states and to construct three main scenarios for the future of Shandiz’s tourism system. This methodological design allowed the study not only to identify key drivers but also to examine how their interactions may produce divergent yet plausible future pathways.
 
Results and discussion
The analysis identified four drivers as particularly strategic for Shandiz’s tourism future: (1) diversification of tourism products, (2) institutional coordination between local and national stakeholders, (3) digital governance infrastructure, and (4) empowerment of non-governmental actors, including communities and private sector entities. These factors, located in the high-influence/high-uncertainty quadrant of the MicMac analysis, were found to be decisive in shaping the trajectory of urban tourism in Shandiz. Scenario analysis yielded three alternative futures. The first scenario depicted a fragmented and vulnerable path, characterized by lack of coordination, inadequate digital infrastructure, and minimal community participation. This pathway risked environmental degradation and erosion of the city’s competitiveness. The second scenario illustrated a transitional trajectory, with partial product diversification and digital adoption, yet constrained by only relative institutional alignment and symbolic rather than meaningful local engagement.
The third scenario, however, was identified as the most desirable and robust. It envisioned a synergistic development model integrating diverse tourism products—such as cultural, creative, agro-tourism, health, and eco-tourism—with full institutional coordination, advanced digital governance systems, and empowered community participation. This scenario highlighted a balanced and resilient framework where local resources are utilized through participatory governance, technological innovation, and institutional cohesion. Importantly, it emphasized that sustainability in Shandiz depends not only on protecting ecological resources but also on strengthening social capital, enhancing institutional capacity, and embedding digital transformation into tourism governance.
The discussion of these findings suggests that the third scenario positions Shandiz to achieve a competitive and smart tourism model. It creates a future where tourism development is inclusive, resilient, and capable of adapting to uncertainties, thereby transforming Shandiz into a model destination for sustainable urban tourism in Iran and beyond.
 
Conclusion
This study concludes that achieving sustainable urban tourism in Shandiz requires strategic attention to four interdependent pillars: diversification of tourism products, institutional coordination, digital governance, and empowerment of non-governmental actors. The third scenario, representing a sustainable, participatory, and technology-driven pathway, provides the most viable roadmap for the city’s future. By leveraging local capacities, embracing digital innovation, and ensuring inclusive governance, Shandiz can secure its position as a competitive and resilient tourism destination.
The implications of this research extend beyond Shandiz, offering insights for other urban destinations grappling with rapid tourism growth and sustainability challenges. The combination of foresight methodologies and scenario planning demonstrated here provides a robust framework for navigating uncertainty and guiding evidence-based policymaking in the tourism sector.
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

Keywords


  1. Acuto, M. (2020). COVID-19: Lessons for an urban(izing) world. One Earth, 2(4), 317–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.04.004
  2. Ap, J. (1992). Residents’ perceptions on tourism impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, 19(4), 665–690.
  3. Azizi, A. (2016). Investigating the Obstacles to Local Economic Development in Iran. Journal of Resistive Economics, 2(1), 15-34. [in persian]
  4. Baft-e Shahr Consulting Engineers. (2001). Development and Comprehensive Plan of Shandiz City. Baft-e Shahr Consulting Engineers Company. [in persian]
  5. Bell, W. (2003). Foundations of futures studies: History, purposes, and knowledge (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). Transaction Publishers. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=6986
  6. Blakely, E. J., & Leigh, N. G. (2010). Planning local economic development: Theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/39.1.90
  7. Butler, R. W. (1980). The concept of a tourist area cycle of evolution: Implications for management. Canadian Geographer, 24(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.1980.tb00970.x
  8. Crompton, J. L. (1979). Motivations for pleasure vacation. Annals of Tourism Research, 6(4), 408–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(79)90004-5
  9. Farnhad Consulting Engineers. (2010). Comprehensive Plan of Shandiz City. Farnhad Consulting Engineers Company. [in persian]
  10. Farnhad Consulting Engineers. (2015). Comprehensive Plan of Shandiz City. Farnhad Consulting Engineers Company. [in persian]
  11. Ghorbani Sepehr, A., Motaqi, A., & Salukvadze, J. (2022). Explaining and Recognizing the Geopolitical Components of the Tehran Metropolis (With Emphasis on Geographical Sources of Power with a Human Nature). Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, 12(4), 307-333. https://doi.org/10.22034/jgeoq.2022.313460.3390[in persian]
  12. Graham, S. (2004). Cities, war and terrorism: Towards an urban geopolitics. Oxford: Blackwell.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753033.ch11
  13. Hall, C. M., & Page, S. J. (2014). The geography of tourism and recreation: Environment, place and space. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203796092
  14. Hines, A., & Bishop, P. (2015). Thinking about the future (2nd ed.). Hinesight. ISBN: 978-0996773409.
  15. Inayatullah, S. (2008). Six pillars: Futures thinking for transforming. Foresight, 10(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680810855991
  16. International Strategic Studies Association. (2012). Urban geopolitics in a time of chaos (1st ed.). The International Strategic Studies Association. ISBN-10: 1892998181, ISBN-13: 978-1892998187.
  17. Keivani, R. (2020). Urban futures: Planning for city foresight and resilience. Cities, 102, 102736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102736
  18. Maximilian, C., Smith, J., & Brown, K. (2024). Smart tourism and urban sustainability: Futures perspectives. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 32(3), 456–472.
  19. Ning, L., & Dittmer, J. (2023). Tourism and geopolitics: Exploring everyday urban tourism geopolitics. Geopolitics, 28(5), 1409–1432. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2022.2050468
  20. Pearce, P. L. (1993). Tourism motivation: A means-end approach. In Tourism research: Critiques and challenges.
  21. Pearce, P. L. (2005). Tourist behaviour: Themes and conceptual schemes. Channel View Publications. https://www.ailun.it/so/st/docenti/pearce_publications.pdf
  22. Poli, R. (2024). Introduction to anticipation studies (2nd ed.). Springer.
  23. Postma, A., & Yeoman, I. (2024). Scenario planning for sustainable urban tourism: A futures approach. Tourism Management, 100, 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2025.2465382
  24. PourAhmad, A., Ziari, K., Hataminejad, H., & Rezainia, H. (2018). An Analysis of the Nature of Public Space in Large-Scale Urban Tourism Projects Based on the 'Social Production of Space' Theory (Case Study: Tehran City). Journal of Urban Tourism, 5(2), 135-159. https://doi.org/10.22059/jut.2018.251169.441 [in persian]
  25. Ray, C. (1999). Endogenous development in the era of reflexive modernity. Journal of Rural Studies, 15(3), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00072-2
  26. Shabani Fard, M., PourAhmad, A., Hosseini, A., & Rashidi, M. (2009). Assessment of Urban Tourism Carrying Capacity and Modeling Sustainable Tourism Cities from a Physical Dimension (Case Study: District 12 of Tehran). Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 9(9), 47-74. [in persian]
  27. Shafiei, H. (2000). Management at the Local Level and Sustainable Development. Urban Management, 1(4), 0-0. [in persian]
  28. Simmie, J., & Martin, R. (2010). The economic resilience of regions: Towards an evolutionary approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsp029
  29. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). (2016). World cities report 2016: Urbanization and development – Emerging futures. UN-Habitat.https://unhabitat.org/world-cities-report-2016
  30. United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO). (2005). Making tourism more sustainable – A guide for policy makers. UNWTO. https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/book/10.18111/9789284408214
  31. UNWTO. (2018). Tourism and the sustainable development goals – Journey to 2030. United Nations World Tourism Organization. https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/book/10.18111/9789284419401
  32. Wang, L., Zhang, H., & Li, Q. (2024). Driving forces of urban tourism development: A futures perspective. Cities, 145, 104–117.
  33. Yilmaz, S., Özgür, A., & Kiliç, S. (2024). Technology-driven urban tourism: Trends and futures. International Journal of Tourism Research, 26(1), 89–103.
  34. Zheng, S., Zhang, X., & Zhang, T. (2018). The effect of infrastructure investment on sustainable development: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.181
  35. Ziaei, M., & Abbasi, D. (2018). Challenges and Approaches to Sustainable Tourism Development: From Theory to Practice. Journal of Sustainable Tourism Research, 1(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.22080/jtpd.2018.1822 [in persian]