Identifying key indicators affecting urban livability with the future research approach: A case study of Kerman city

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Urban Planning, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran

2 Department of Architecture, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman , Iran

3 Department of Urban Planning, Rafsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rafsanjan, Iran

Abstract

A B S T R A C T
In various cities, attention to urban livability, meaning the city's suitability for living and the compatibility of the environment with urban activities, is important. The present study seeks to extract the key indicators affecting urban livability in Kerman city. This research is applied and developmental in nature and has utilized qualitative and quantitative methods. For this purpose, in the first step, 24 initial factors affecting urban livability in Kerman were extracted through interviews with experts and specialists. Subsequently, using expert opinions gathered via a questionnaire and performing structural analysis in MICMAC software, the key indicators affecting urban livability in Kerman were identified. The selection of participants in the research was purposeful and conducted using the snowball sampling technique. In this regard, theoretical saturation was achieved with 14 participants, but interviews continued up to 16 individuals, and in the quantitative section, the questionnaire was administered to the same individuals. The fill rate in the structural analysis matrix was 87.67%, indicating a relatively high degree of influence among the indicators. The findings show that the indicators "mines around the city," "industrial towns," "various factories," "status of health and medical care," and "various transportation routes" are the key indicators affecting urban livability in Kerman. Among these, given that mines, industrial towns, and factories are economic indicators of livability, it can be said that focusing on the development and prosperity of existing job opportunities in Kerman city plays a key role in enhancing its livability, and it is necessary for urban management to plan for strengthening these job opportunities.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
In different cities, attention to urban livability is important, meaning that the city is suitable for living and the environment is compatible with urban activities. A livable city is a safe environment for living, has a competitive economy, and includes a high quality of life and environmental sustainability. Given its concept, which is "achieving development with minimal resource consumption while ensuring the well-being of humans and the earth," some consider it synonymous with the concept of sustainability, while others consider it related to the concepts of quality of place, quality of life, and healthy society. Despite the fact that achieving a livable city is very important, there is no vision of a livable city in many cities. Among these cities is the city of Kerman, which in one of the most recent comments on the situation of Kerman from the perspective of the authorities, emphasized the poor condition of Kerman, and numerous problems have been raised for Kerman, including "dead social life," and various environmental, economic, social, physical, and infrastructure problems have been mentioned for it. The present study seeks to extract key indicators affecting urban livability in Kerman city.
 
Methodology
The present study is an applied and developmental study and uses mixed qualitative and quantitative methods. For this purpose, in the first step, 24 primary factors affecting urban livability in Kerman were extracted through interviews with experts. The validity of the interviews was also confirmed through content validity, based on which the experts confirmed the comprehensiveness of the indicators. Content validity ensures that the indicators are comprehensive and cover all aspects of the subject. In this regard, the selection of participants in the study was purposeful and was carried out using the snowball technique; so that initially 4 experts were selected based on the indicators of familiarity with the concepts of livability, structural analysis and futures studies, the city of Kerman, and readiness and availability for cooperation, and after interviewing them, the primary indicators affecting urban livability in Kerman were extracted. Although theoretical saturation was achieved with 14 participants and no new indicators were proposed, the interviews continued until 16 people. Among these 16 people, 4 were academic members of urban planning and 12 were researchers in the fields of futures studies and livability. All participants also had a good understanding of the city of Kerman. In the second step, questionnaires were presented to experts to give scores from 0 to 3 to the 24 identified factors in the form of a structural analysis matrix based on the degree of influence they have on each other. Then, in the third step, considering that the best way to aggregate the opinions of experts is to use the mode of opinions, the mode of each of these data was extracted using Excel software and these numbers were entered into the Micmac software to identify key indicators affecting the livability of Kerman.
 
Results and discussion
The degree of filling in the structural analysis matrix was 87.67 percent, which indicates a relatively high impact of the indicators on each other. The findings show that the indicators of "mines around the city", "industrial towns", "various factories", "health and treatment status" and "various transportation routes" are key indicators affecting urban livability in Kerman. Previously, various studies that have examined livability have mainly examined livability in the present time using different statistical methods, while Oshnavii Nooshabadi and Mohammad Ebrahimi (2022) for the city of Kashan and Ali Akbari and Akbari (2018) for the metropolis of Tehran have used a method similar to the present study, namely structural analysis, to identify livability indicators. Therefore, the present study is in line with them in terms of method and the results of the present study are comparable to the results of their work. Meanwhile, the health and medical status is a key indicator that has also been mentioned in the research of Oshnavii Noushabadi and Mohammad Ebrahimi (2022) for the city of Kashan. If we also consider the indicators of industrial towns and various factories from an economic perspective, it is in line with the economic dimension proposed by Ali Akbari and Akbari (2018) for the Kerman metropolis, and this indicates the overall importance of the key indicators mentioned in urban livability.
 
Conclusion
In general, livability has various dimensions including economic, social, environmental, physical and managerial, and these dimensions and their indicators have different importance in different cities. In this regard, in identifying the key indicators affecting livability in Kerman city, it was noteworthy that among the key indicators affecting livability in Kerman, there are also various economic (industrial parks, various factories), environmental (mines around the city), physical and infrastructure (asphalt roads and railways and airports) and social (health and treatment status) dimensions. With a closer look at these indicators, it can be said that what can cause the continuity and prosperity of livability in Kerman city are indicators that are closely related to people's employment. This result is important because, given that mines, industrial towns, and factories are economic indicators of livability, it can be said that focusing on the development and prosperity of existing job opportunities in Kerman city plays a key role in promoting its livability, which requires urban management to plan to strengthen these job opportunities.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
The authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

Keywords


  1. Aarassteh, M., Baghban, A., & Baghban, S. (2020). Identification of key factors affecting urban resilience with a foresight approach, case study: Mashhad metropolis. Journal of Physical Development Planning, 5(2), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.30473/psp.2020.7007 [in Persian]
  2. Aghapour, M. J. (2017). Group decision making and game theory with an operations research approach. University of Tehran Press. [in Persian]
  3. Aliakbari, E., & Akbari, M. (2017). Structural-interpretive modeling of factors affecting the livability of Tehran metropolis. Journal of Spatial Planning (Amayesh-e Faza), 21(1), 1–31. [in Persian]
  4. Alikhani, M., & Banderabad, A. (2010). Survey of global and local criteria of livable city. Hoviate Shahr, 8(17), 65–76. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17359562.1393.8.17.7.0 [in Persian]
  5. Ashnoye Neyshabadi, A., & Mohammad-Ebrahimi, M. (2021). Determining the key drivers affecting urban livability with a futures studies approach (case study: Kashan city). Journal of Geography and Planning, 25(76), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.22034/gp.2021.13132 [in Persian]
  6. Badland, H., Whitzman, C., Lowe, M., Davern, M., Aye, L., Butterworth, I., ... & Giles-Corti, B. (2014). Urban liveability: emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health. Social science & medicine, 111, 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.003
  7. Bo, F., Danlin, Y., & Yaojun, Z. (2019). The livable urban landscape: GIS and remote sensing extracted land use assessment for urban livability in Changchun Proper, China [J]. Land Use Policy, 87, 104048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104048
  8. Ferreira, C., Kalantari, Z., & Pereira, P. (2021). Liveable cities: Current environmental challenges and paths to urban sustainability. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111458
  9. Gholich, M., Mirzaei, H., & Rabbani, T. (2019). Urban foresight as an approach for urban policy making and planning, emphasizing the experience of Tehran metropolis foresight. Iranian Journal of Futures Studies, 4(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.30479/jfs.2019.11038.1083 [in Persian]
  10. Gholipour, A., Aboue Ardakan, M., & Pidayesh, E. (2011). Investigating factors affecting city image for effective city branding. Journal of Fine Arts - Architecture and Urban Planning, (45), 37–46. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22286020.1390.3.45.4.6 [in Persian]
  11. https://www.amazon.com/Edgeless-Cities-Exploring-Elusive-Metropolis/dp/0815706111
  12. Irandoost, K., Eisa-Loo, A. A., & Shahmoradi, B. (2015). The livability index in urban environments, case study: The central part of the holy city of Qom. Journal of Urban Economics and Management, 4(13), 101–118. [in Persian]
  13. Kok, K., van Vliet, M., Bärlund, I., Dubel, A., & Sendzimir, J. (2011). Combining participative backcasting and exploratory scenario development: experiences from the SCENES project. Technological forecasting and social change, 78(5), 835-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.01.004
  14. Kuosa, T, (2011), Evolution of futures studies. Futures, 43, 327-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.04.001
  15. Lang, R. (2003). Edgeless cities: Exploring the elusive metropolis. Brookings Institution Press.
  16. Larice, M. A. (2005). Great neighborhoods: The livability and morphology of high density neighborhoods in urban North America. University of California, Berkeley. https://www.proquest.com/docview/305031038
  17. Leby, J. L., & Hashim, A. H. (2010). Liveability dimensions and attributes: Their relative importance in the eyes of neighbourhood residents. Journal of construction in developing countries, 15(1), 67-91.
  18. Mobarak, O., Lalepour, M., & Afzali Goroh, Z. (2017). Evaluation and analysis of the dimensions and components of resilience in Kerman city. Geography and Development, (47), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.22111/gdij.2017.3185 [in Persian]
  19. Mohammad, H., & Behboudi Sadabad, M. (2021). Application of futures studies in conservation planning of historical texture (case study: Yazd world heritage site). Urban Geography and Planning Research Journal, 9(2), 417–437. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.313532.1403 [in Persian]
  20. Mohammadi Dehcheshmeh, P. (2020). Investigating the status of urban livability indicators in Shahrekord based on the position of urban management. Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 20(57), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.29252/jgs.20.57.205 [in Persian]
  21. Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2020). Urban and transport planning pathways to carbon neutral, liveable and healthy cities; A review of the current evidence. Environment International, 140, 105661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105661
  22. Padram, A. (2009). Futures studies: A new field for inquiry. Defense Science and Technology Futures Research Center - Educational and Research Institute of Defense Industries. [in Persian]
  23. Parliament Research Center, Office of Fundamental Government Studies. (2018). Futures studies of the world. https://rc.majlis.ir/fa [in Persian]
  24. Rahnam, M. R., Ghanbari, M., Mohammadi Hamidi, S., & Hosseini, S. M. (2019). Assessment and measurement of urban livability in Ahvaz metropolis. Journal of Sustainable City, 2(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22034/jsc.2019.197229.1090 [in Persian]
  25. Safaipour, M., & Shanbehpour, F. (2019). Foresight of urban development based on scenario writing (case study: Ahvaz metropolis). Geography and Human Relationships, 2(3), 456–475. [in Persian]
  26. Shahr va Andisheh-e Mana Consulting Engineers. (2011). Studies of the detailed plan of Kerman. [in Persian]
  27. Soleimani Mehranjani, M., Tolaee, S., Rafieian, M., Zanganeh, A., & Khazaeinejad, F. (2016). Urban livability: Concept, principles, dimensions and indicators. Geographical Urban Planning Research, 4(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2016.58120 [in Persian]
  28. Soleimani Moghaddam, P., Ghandehari, M., & Piri, F. (2018). Analysis of the livability and vitality of worn-out textures, case study: Ameri neighborhood of Ahvaz city. Journal of Urban Structure and Function Studies, 5(17), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.22080/shahr.1970.2112 [in Persian]
  29. UNIDO, U. (2005). UNIDO technology foresight manual: organization and methods. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization. https://downloads.unido.org/ot/47/04/4704632/MIYAKE_TII_STF_RER_2005_XPUKR03016_1.pdf
  30. Yassin, H. H. (2019). Livable city: An approach to pedestrianization through tactical urbanism. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(1), 251-259.
  31. Zal Nejad, K., Hosseini, S. F., & Alipour, Y. (2019). The effect of principles of livable city on promoting the level of citizens' satisfaction, case study: District 4 of Tehran Municipality's Region 4. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, (28), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.22034/aaud.2019.111756.1388 [in Persian]